Final Pentagon budget bill features Taiwan, Aukus and counters to China’s influence
- The US$872.4 billion ‘must-pass’ National Defence Authorisation Act includes Taipei cybersecurity deal and prioritises Aukus arms sales
- The bill is headed for votes in the House and Senate before US President Joe Biden signs it into law
The legislation, which establishes the top-line budget and directs policy for the Pentagon for the coming financial year, is a “must-pass” bill because its enactment is required for members of the military to receive their pay and benefits on time. As a result, provisions not strictly tied to defence often make it into the legislation.
For the first time, the defence policy bill calls for cybersecurity cooperation with Taiwan to “defend military networks, infrastructure and systems”.
And it mandates an independent study on the global economic impact of a military invasion or blockade of Taiwan by Beijing.
But compared to last year, the bill has relatively little new on defending Taiwan, and instead calls for oversight for previously established programmes.
As with previous years, the bill avoids measures that explicitly challenge the US’s one-China policy, in which Washington acknowledges Beijing’s position that Taiwan is part of China.
US defence act ‘vital’ to security of Taiwan, President Tsai Ing-wen says
One such provision that got cut would have barred the Pentagon from funding any map that depicts “Taiwan, Kinmen [also known as Quemoy], Matsu, Penghu, Wuciou, Green Island or Orchid Island as part of the territory of the People’s Republic of China”.
Other Taiwan-related provisions in draft versions were removed, including ones requiring the Pentagon to maintain a non-combatant evacuation plan for Taiwan and to invite Taiwan to the US-led Rim of the Pacific military exercise.
Beijing regards Taiwan as a rogue province that must be eventually be united with the mainland, by force if necessary.
The NDAA also includes several measures to strengthen Aukus, the security partnership the US established in 2021 with Australia and Britain widely seen as an alliance to counter China in the Indo-Pacific.
The legislation fully authorises the trilateral pact, which would allow the US and Britain to help Australia develop its own nuclear-powered submarine fleet.
It mandates numerous reports on topics including Beijing’s infrastructure investments, defence budget, human rights violations towards Uygurs and efforts to increase influence in the Middle East, Africa and Pacific Islands.
China awaits whether US interest rate cut, better ties bring economic tailwinds
Beyond reports, the NDAA establishes an “intelligence community coordinator” to shine a light on the Chinese government’s “commitment of atrocities”.
The legislation also includes several measures meant to counter Chinese influence in the US.
With its enactment, any school receiving Defence Department funding must commit to closing their Confucius Institutes by 2026.
China’s Confucius Institutes are disappearing from US campuses
The bill also amends the definition of Confucius Institute to include “any cultural institute funded by the [Chinese government]”.
On the entertainment front, the NDAA prohibits Defence Department funding from supporting films that have complied or are “likely to comply” with censorship demands from the Chinese government.
China’s role in fentanyl trafficking, a priority topic in US-China relations, also found its way into the bill. One provision calls for the defence secretary to determine if Beijing has assisted in or approved the transfer of fentanyl precursors or products to Mexico.
02:23
US charges Chinese manufacturers for alleged fentanyl ingredient trafficking in landmark case
The NDAA requires an audit of the Defence Department’s funding to research laboratories backed by the Chinese government. It also prohibits Pentagon procurement from Chinese military companies operating in the US.
But it omits a measure that would have required researchers financed by the Pentagon to disclose personal information like their nationality and educational background. The White House had noted that such a provision would be unduly burdensome.
In the same vein, the bill left out a provision that would have prohibited the procurement of computers and printers from China.
Other high-profile China-related measures did not make it into the bill’s final version.
US bills targeting China AI, Hong Kong offices clear key House panel
The provision would have required US businesses to notify the Treasury Department before making transactions in China, Russia and other “countries of concern” involving technologies with military applications.
Republican congressman Patrick McHenry of North Carolina, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, pushed to drop the measure, which had bipartisan support.
McHenry has long argued that letting US companies make investments gives them control and useful insight into the national security and technology capabilities of foreign firms.
A funding programme for the Pacific Islands also failed to make the cut, though lawmakers are trying to push it through other vehicles.
Earlier this year, the Biden administration concluded negotiations for the Compacts of Free Association (COFA), a set of agreements providing economic aid and migration rights to three Pacific Islands countries in exchange for exclusive military access.
But the funding for the programmes has yet to find a home, leading to concerns that Beijing might find a way to exploit the situation.
The NDAA is an authorisation bill, so it creates programmes rather than fund them. Congress must pass appropriations bills to legally grant the government authority to spend federal money.
US congressman who opposes China investment curbs won’t run for re-election
But the NDAA can authorise existing programmes to continue. Notably, this year’s bill includes a short-term extension of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
The programme, which would have expired on December 31, allows the US government to conduct warrantless electronic surveillance on Americans when they interact with foreigners.
Several Asian-American groups have opposed its reauthorisation, claiming it has been used in a discriminatory manner for purposes unrelated to national security.
Passage of the bill would extend Section 702 until April, giving Congress more time to come up with a compromise that can pass both chambers.
